Technique
My Portfolio
Didn’t get it yesterday, but I finally got my JavaScript/jQuery based Portfolio up and running. I’m using Galleria – a nice script that has Flickr support integrated.
It’s pretty simple to set up – but the docs aren’t straight forward
<?xml version="1.0" ?>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<title>Christian Kildau's Portfolio</title>
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="./galleria.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="./galleria.flickr.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="./galleria.fullscreen.js"></script>
</head>
<body>
<div id="galleria">
<script type="text/javascript">
api_key = '0a5a49ea38e03b11f477aaf066b5dcd2'
var flickr = new Galleria.Flickr(api_key);
flickr.getSet('72157614373115604', function(data) {
$('#galleria').galleria({
data_source: data,
image_crop: false,
show_info: true,
autoplay: true,
transition: 'fade',
preload: 3,
});
});
</script>
</div>
</body>
</html>
No Flash required, so it even works on my (veeeery slow) iPhone 3G….
EDIT: Forgot the link.
Photo Workflow and Backup 2.0
I’m sitting here on a train trying to use the time to re-organize my photo workflow and thought I’d share it here to also have a blogpost for this week… Inspired by Chase Jarvis’ ego post on his blog, I knew how to not do it. I’m not gonna show you a lot of totally needless Apple devices just to make things look more awesome.
I love Apple and their OS, so don’t get me wrong, but you can always overdo it and make things look like you got sponsored…
Finding the right workflow isn’t easy. The first thing I did was writing down what I wanted and what I already own:
- A MacBook Pro
- A Mac Mini
- A fast NAS (e.g. Fileserver) with tons of space
- An on-site backup to an external HDD
Currently I have my entire Library on the MacBook Pro’s internal 5400rpm hard-drive. This is just slow. Things feel very sluggish, which is why I want to replace that hard-drive with an SSD. SSDs are expensive or small, so I need to move my Library (80Gb at the moment) somewhere else… would be pretty easy if there weren’t my requirements:
- Have backups of everything
- Be able to import and edit Photos on the MacBook Pro when on the road
- Be able to import and edit Photos on the Mac Mini when at home
- Sit on the couch and edit some photos I imported to the Mac Mini earlier
- Upload Photos to the Web from on the road and from home trough Lightroom
- Have a separate archive where all my photos are seriously safe
- Be able to access part of the Archive from everywhere in the world
My solution is kinda complex. First of all I split my Library into two. One for the Archive and one for the “Current Work”. Nothing special about that.
- The Archive holds my finished Photos. The Photos them self sit on the NAS whereas the Catalog and other Metadata sits on the Mac Mini’s SSD for performance reasons. This means I can only use the Archive on the Mac Mini. Backups are handled by the NAS and are stored on an external HDD.
- The “Current Work” Library contains my recent photos which I’m still planning to edit. For flexibility reasons everything is stored on an external HDD and backed up to another external HDD from within Lightroom. No Time Machine here for the external HDD since I’m planning to use this Library on multiple computers.
- Photos are moved to the Archive when everything is finished.
- A Publish Service exports my favorite Shots in the Archive to a public folder on the NAS. I can easily access that folder at home or trough my VPN from everywhere in the world. Maybe I’ll add iPhoto’s sharing…
- I am also thinking of adding something like Crashplan to add another level of security by having an off-site Backup… not just for my photos.
This all sounds complex, maybe this makes it clearer (or worse
):
Too Much Polarization

On my recent trips I mostly shot with my Hoya HD Polarizer on. I always adjusted the angle of the filter to get the strongest effect and it always looked good in the viewfinder! Just awesome blue skies. Sadly I couldn’t check the result on the display, because it was too bright outside. Back home I imported my shots to the computer just to see that many of the shots are unusable, because the sky is horribly dark. It looked different through the viewfinder, which is related to the much lower dynamic range of the digital sensor compared to the eyes. (+ The Photo is underxposed)
It’s simply a handling error on my side. The effect of a polarization filter depends on the atmosphere and the angle to the reflecting surface. In the above image the sky was very clear and it seems like I shot in about an 90° angle to the sun. A simple rotation to lessen the strength of the polfilter, and the sky would look much more natural.
So, always check your results! I think I’ll get a Hoodman Hoodloupe for my camera…
Grad ND – Why you DON’T need one!
Earlier this year I was about to buy a graduated neutral density filter. These filters are mostly being used to darken the sky in landscape shots. I did a lot of research and in the end wanted at least two filters in the expensive glass 100x100mm version which I would then simply hold and move in front of my lens to have some flexibility.
In the end I didn’t buy anything for three simple reasons: (1) About 100€ for two good filters is just too much for those rare scenes I would really use them (at least in my eyes), (2) It’s pretty inconvenient to carry around when traveling light and (3) I would need an additional (and expensive) filter holder for long exposures.
My solution (to at least some degree) is to use the Graduated Filter tool in Lightroom. I used this technique a lot on my recent B&W Photos. The good thing is, that you have full control about the intensity, the height, the strength and the position of the effect.
I don’t know if that’s common practice, but at least I wasn’t aware of it and didn’t do it before. Matt Kloskowski at lightroomkillertips.com did a great video about it: link.
The downside is that this doesn’t help in extreme situations. Most people say you have about 1 f-stop backup if you’re shooting RAW. You can go lower, but you will loose quality. So in very extreme situations you will still need a dedicated Grad ND, or you can do HDR or exposure fusing. But for me this technique works well enough.
Below I attached a before and after (-2 Stops) screenshot of the Graduated Filter effect in Lightroom.

Going Black & White
I am recently very interested in B&W (No, not Bowers & Wilkins, but Black&White). I was digging through my unedited photos today and tried B&W conversion on some older ones from last winter that I actually found rather boring because of the flat light.
Here’s my favorite so far:
I played with contrasts, clarity, color channels, added a graduated filter and so on to get this look. Here’s what it looked like out of the camera:

What do you think? Did I overdo it?
How to Clean Your Camera Gear
Inspired by a conversation on Twitter I thought I’d tell you how I clean my gear. I read many posts by professional photographers out there that suggest to use commercial and expensive stuff like Lens Clens, Eclipse and so on, but most of them are just re-labeled alcohols. I also read through several forums about alternatives, but it often becomes a question of faith.
I used to use Methanol, but it can be hard to purchase here in Germany because it’s highly toxic. Now I use Ethanol, it’s non-toxic (in fact it’s drinking alcohol). You can get it inexpensively in most pharmacies and it works almost as good as Methanol. Don’t use Isopropyl. It’s hygroscopic and leaves a lot of residue after evaporation.
My cleaning procedure is pretty simple and inexpensive. Except the (M)Ethanol you need a Rocket Blower, a Microfiber Cloth, Lens Tissues and some Q-Tips.
The very first thing I clean is the Camera body and the lenses. To do so dismount the lens from the Camera body and put all the caps on. Then use a dampish microfiber cloth and wipe off all dirt from your body and lenses. If you have a zoom-lens that extends when zooming, zoom it all the way out.
The next thing I clean are the front element of my lenses and my filters. Take off your front-cap and use the Rocket Blower to blow away any dust because it might scratch the glass. If you have fingerprints or spots on the front element, put one drop of Ethanol on a wadded lens tissue and wipe it with very little pressure in circulating movements from the inside to the outside. Don’t do this on the rear element of your lens because they are very damageable! Just use the Rocket Blower to blow away any dust!
From time to time I also clean the contacts of the lens and the lens mount. To do so, put some Ethanol on a Q-Tip and twist it along the contacts.
The last thing I clean is the sensor. I don’t do wet cleanings myself, but I usually don’t even need to. Just don’t change your lenses in dusty environments. If I ever get visible dust on my sensor (which only happened once after shooting in the desert and on the beach on my Trip to Egypt) I bring my camera to a local camera store and let them clean it.
All I do myself is blowing the dust off. To do so you need to lock the mirror up in your camera’s menu (full batteries required). Then use the Rocket Blower and throw some hard blows on the sensor from a short distance. But take care to not touch the sensor.
How often should you clean your gear? Well… as less as possible and as often as you need to. I have cleaned my coated lenses with Ethanol for a year now, and I don’t see any damage to the coatings, nor have I found any serious reports on the Internet about it. But you should be careful and don’t overdo it. I usually clean the body and lens after each shoot and the front element only if it’s dirty.
Also have a look at the YouTube videos of Lilkiwiguy87.


Hi, my name is Chris. I am a wannabe photog, traveler & geek that lives in Hesse, Germany. 